After a lot of time of sitting in CVS, a beta of Wget 1.9 is
available. To see what's new since 1.8, check the `NEWS' file in the
distribution. Get it from:
http://fly.srk.fer.hr/~hniksic/wget/wget-1.9-beta1.tar.gz
Please test it on as many different platforms as possible and in the
places
how do I get off this list? I tried a few times before &
got no response from the server.
thank you-
Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Hrvoje Niksic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 8:53 PM
> To: Randy Paries
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: bug maybe
"Randy Paries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not sure if this is a bug or not.
I guess it could be called a bug, although it's no simple oversight.
Wget currently doesn't support large files.
Not sure if this is a bug or not.
i can not get a file over 2GB (i get a MAX file Exceeded error message)
this is on a redhat 9 box. GNU Wget 1.8.2,
Thanks
Randy
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> > I doubt any system that does not support off_t does support LFS.
>
> As I mentioned in the first message, LFS is not the only thing you
> need large values for. Think download quota or the sum of downloaded
> bytes. You should be able to specify `--
Hi Hrvoje :)
* Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> Using #ifdefs to switch between %d/%lld/%j *is* completely portable,
> but it requires three translations for each message. The translators
> would feast on my flesh, howling at the moonlight.
Sure ;)) Anyway, it will happen in j
Hello
I am using wget to download only new/modified files from an website where I
cant delete files.
I am using wget like this:
Wget -m -nv -nH -P /local/file/dir -a /var/adm/messages
ftp://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Everything works great, except that I need to process the files I am getting
local
DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, you're true, but... How about using C99 large integer types
> (intmax_t and family)?
But then I can use `long long' just as well, which is supported by C99
and (I think) required to be at least 64 bits wide. Portability is
the whole problem, so suggest
Hi Hrvoje :))
* Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> There have been several attempts to fix this:
[...]
> * In its own patches, Debian introduced the use of large file APIs and
> `long long'. While that's perfectly fine for Debian, it is not
> portable. Neither the large file API
10 matches
Mail list logo
