On Sat, 28 May 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>Dan Bolser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I think --timestamping fails for files > 2Gb
>
>Thanks for the report. Wget 1.9.x doesn't support 2+GB files, not
>only for timestamping. You can try Wget 1.10-beta from
>ftp://ftp.deepspace6.net/pub/ds6/sourc
Dan Bolser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think --timestamping fails for files > 2Gb
Thanks for the report. Wget 1.9.x doesn't support 2+GB files, not
only for timestamping. You can try Wget 1.10-beta from
ftp://ftp.deepspace6.net/pub/ds6/sources/wget/wget-1.10-beta1.tar.bz2
Maurice Volaski wrote:
> wget's -m option seems to be able to ignore most of the files it should
> download from a site. Is this simply because wget can download only the
> files it can see? That is, if the web server's directory indexing option
> is off and a page on the site is present on the se
I think --timestamping fails for files > 2Gb
wget tries to download the file again with the .1 extension (as if you
were not using --timestamping).
This only happens to a big file in a list of files I am wgetting.
