Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
> although i really dislike the name "--no-follow-excluded-html", i
> certainly agree on the necessity to introduce such a feature into
> wget.
>
> can we come up with a better name (and reach consensus on that)
> before i include this feature in wget 1.11?
I agree "no" shou
Tobias Tiederle wrote:
>> I just set up my compile environment for WGet again.
>> When I did regex support, I had the same problem with exclusion, so I
>> introduced a new parameter "--follow-excluded-html".
>> (Which is of course the default) but you can turn it off with
>> --no-follow-excluded-ht
