-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've just pushed some changes to mainline that result in Wget including
its Mercurial revision when that information is available (a truncated
SHA-1 hash, plus a "+" sign if there are local modifications.)
Among other things, version.c is now genera
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ray Phillips wrote:
> I thought I'd report my experiences trying to install wget 1.10.2 on
> NetBSD/i386 3.1. I'll append the contents of config.log to the end of
> this email.
> gcc -I. -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSYSTEM_WGETRC=\"/usr/local/etc/wget
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Micah Cowan wrote:
> Three, I have CLOSED THE TRUNK in subversion ("svn rm $WGETROOT/trunk").
> Changes to wget-1.11 will continue to be merged to
> $WGETROOT/branches/1.11 until the release, after which point Subversion
> will no longer be used for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Several items to announce.
One, the Mercurial "trunk" repository has been renamed to "mainline",
which seems a better label, considering that we're not really talking
about a "trunk" and "branches" any more (in fact, the mainline repo
could conceiva
> Go ahead and send it on here so we can comment on the code :-)
...
I sent it to wget-patches; if you are not subscribed to that, you can
find it at...
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.wget.patches/2190
Discussion here or there, I don't care
--
Best Regards.
Please keep in touch.
> [private response to limit list clutter]
or not. oops.
>...
> Note though that my patch *does* dominate the bandwidth for about 15 seconds
> to measure the available bandwidth before it falls back. On my
> network, it seemed
> to take a few seconds before enough bytes were transferred to get
On 10/9/07, Jim Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Micah Cowan wrote:
>
> > As to whether or not it will be included in mainline Wget, that depends
> > on the answer to your question, "does this seem like something others of
> > you could use?" I, personally, wouldn't find it v
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Micah Cowan wrote:
> As to whether or not it will be included in mainline Wget, that depends
> on the answer to your question, "does this seem like something others of
> you could use?" I, personally, wouldn't find it very useful (I rarely
> use even --limit-rate), so I'd be in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Micah Cowan wrote:
> Jochen Roderburg wrote:
>> Unfortunately, however, a new regression crept in:
>> In the case timestamping=on, content-disposition=off, no local file present
>> it
>> does now no HEAD (correctly), but two (!!) GETS and transfers
