it out,
I would benefit from your analysis.
Roger L. Beeman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Jamie Zawinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ...since "^M" and "^H" tricks don't work in emacs shell buffers,
> > they just make a mess.
The tricks seem to be working fine in emacs versions 21.1.1 and 21.2.1
for some reason.
Roger L. Beeman
rage" and "average" that with the
new value. This would be very easy if the measurement interval
were constant. The pow function is used to normalize the values
based on the variable measurement interval. Notice that if the
measurement interval is equal to RATE_INTERVAL the caclulation
boils down to (old-value + new-value) / 2.
Roger L. Beeman
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> "Roger L. Beeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> >
> >> Agreed wholeheartedly, but how would you *implement* a non-jittering
> >> ETA? Do you
and shift right.
Justifications are that the current measurement is the most likely
predictor of future behavior and that previous measurements are
weighted diminishingly over time.
You must chose how to normalize the measurement based on irregularity
in the measurement interval, however.
Roger L. Beeman
your time if this suggestion violates some
gnu convention for file naming.
Roger L. Beeman
e
system converts to GMT). Any help on undoing my damage would be
appreciated.
Roger L. Beeman
