Greetings,
I have successfully built wget-1.8 under linux-2.4.xx (at home)
and under SunOS-5.5, but under SunOS-4.1.4, I get a compile-time
error:
gcc -I. -I../../../../src/wget-1.8/src-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSYSTEM_WGETRC=\"/u/shelto
n/new/SunOS-4.1/etc/wgetrc\" -DLOCALEDIR=\"/u/shelton/new/Su
Vin Shelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have successfully built wget-1.8 under linux-2.4.xx (at home) and
> under SunOS-5.5, but under SunOS-4.1.4, I get a compile-time error:
>
> ../../../../src/wget-1.8/src/retr.c:682: `RAND_MAX' undeclared (first use in this fun
> ction)
[...]
> Please le
On 2001-12-15 07:37 +0100, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Is there a good fallback value of RAND_MAX for systems that don't
> bother to define it?
The standard (SUS2) says :
The value of the {RAND_MAX} macro will be at least 32767.
--
André Majorel
Work: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2001-12-15 07:37 +0100, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>
>> Is there a good fallback value of RAND_MAX for systems that don't
>> bother to define it?
>
> The standard (SUS2) says :
>
> The value of the {RAND_MAX} macro will be at least 32767.
c9x says th
On 2001-12-16 19:02 +0100, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 2001-12-15 07:37 +0100, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a good fallback value of RAND_MAX for systems that don't
> >> bother to define it?
> >
> > The standard (SUS2) says :
> >
> > Th
Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 5th edition, 6th edition, 7th edition and System III all returned
> 0-32767. As RAND_MAX didn't exist at the time, plenty of code must
> have been written that assumed 0-32767. For that reason I think it
> unlikely that anybody ever wrote an implementat
