Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> H> Maybe it should rather vary between 0.5*wait and 1.5*wait?
> There you go again making assumptions about what the user wants.
Simply looking for a more reasonable default.
H> Maybe it should rather vary between 0.5*wait and 1.5*wait?
There you go again making assumptions about what the user wants.
H> I think it'd be a shame to spend more arguments on such a rarely-used
H> feature.
--random-wait[=a,b,c,d...] loaded with lots of downwardly compatible
arguments that are
Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "--random-wait causes the time between requests to vary between 0 and
> 2 * wait seconds, where wait was specified using the --wait option, "
>
> So one can no longer specify a minimum wait time!
Good point. Maybe it should rather vary between 0.5*wait
21 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087
-- ITALY
>-Original Message-
>From: Vladi Belperchinov-Shabanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:38 PM
>To: Herold Heiko
>Cc: List wget-bug (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: --random-wait
>
>
>hi!
>
hi!
--random-wait=20 between 0 and 20 secs.
--random-wait=20..30 between 20 and 30 (closed-closed) :)))
or of cource:
--random-wait=20-30
P! Vladi.
Herold Heiko wrote:
>
> I couldn't test that option yet,
>
> but it seems to use 0 .. 2*opt.wait for it's random wai
