On Mon, March 6, 2006 09:56, Tony Lewis wrote:
> Are you sure that's what you want to do? Even if wget didn't silently
> ignore
> -r (as Mauro pointed out in his response to you), the options imply that
> everything in the path should be written to "file" (presumably appended
> one
> after the oth
McDonald, Jacob M. wrote:
> When using, for instance:
> wget -r -l 15 -O file http://1.2.3.4/path
> the -O doesn't seem to work as intended. wget downloads a single file
> (or two including robots.txt) and quits without any errors. It seems
> satisfied it has done its job.
>
> Without -O the tre
