Re: SSL bad random seed

2001-11-20 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Christian Fraenkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No problem. I will try to implement it (more or less) like Daniel > Stenberg > suggested in his mail > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cool. Note that, as far as I'm concerned, you don't need to worry about old versions of OpenSSL, SSL support in Wget being

Re: SSL bad random seed

2001-11-20 Thread Christian Fraenkel
> I remember discussions about this, but I am hardly the person to fix > it, as I have zero knowledge about (and need for) SSL. Christian, > could you take a look at this? I can dig up old messages about this > if you don't have them. No problem. I will try to implement it (more or less) like D

Re: SSL bad random seed

2001-11-20 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just want to remind the SSL-fiddling guys here that there's still > no proper random seed for systems without a /dev/urandom. I remember discussions about this, but I am hardly the person to fix it, as I have zero knowledge about (and need for) SSL

SSL bad random seed

2001-11-20 Thread Daniel Stenberg
Hej I just want to remind the SSL-fiddling guys here that there's still no proper random seed for systems without a /dev/urandom. Lemme show you: % wget -d https://https.site.com DEBUG output created by Wget 1.8-dev on solaris2.7. parseurl ("https://https.site.com";) -> host https.site.com ->