RE: FAQ needed (was wget: relative link to non-relative)

2002-11-11 Thread Herold Heiko
aniel Webb'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FAQ needed (was wget: relative link to non-relative) > > > Herold Heiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This seems to be a bad timeframe for most developers or skilled > > individuals following wget, mostly due

Re: FAQ needed (was wget: relative link to non-relative)

2002-11-09 Thread Noel Köthe
On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 18:50, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Hello, > I was thinking about the bug reports... although I have long opposed > to this, now I believe it might actually be better to switch to > Bugzilla for tracking bugs. That way, even if maintainers are not > active 100% of the time, the bug

Re: FAQ needed (was wget: relative link to non-relative)

2002-11-09 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Herold Heiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This seems to be a bad timeframe for most developers or skilled > individuals following wget, mostly due to real-world time > constrainsts as far as I understand. Yes. To make things worse, I am going to serve the civil service for the next eight months

Re: FAQ needed (was wget: relative link to non-relative)

2002-10-18 Thread Andre Majorel
On 2002-10-17 12:16 -0600, Daniel Webb wrote: > Also, concerning the mailing list, I am not interested in using a kludgy > web-based interface to an email archive. Where are the mbox download > links? Amen. -- André Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/

Re: FAQ needed (was wget: relative link to non-relative)

2002-10-18 Thread Daniel Webb
t; -- > -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 > -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 > -- ITALY > > > -----Original Message- > > From: Daniel Webb [mailto:webb@;danielwebb.us] > > Sent: W

FAQ needed (was wget: relative link to non-relative)

2002-10-17 Thread Herold Heiko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: wget: relative link to non-relative > > > I've been watching this list for a couple of days, and I > think it's just > people asking questions (me included) with no one around to > answer them. > > > On 16 Oct 2002, hao c

RE: wget: relative link to non-relative

2002-10-16 Thread Vernon, Clayton
. -Original Message- From: Franki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: wget: relative link to non-relative yeah, I have been lurking here for over a week, was going to ask a question, but didn't see any answers, so I wasn&#x

RE: wget: relative link to non-relative

2002-10-16 Thread Franki
ED] Subject: Re: wget: relative link to non-relative I've been watching this list for a couple of days, and I think it's just people asking questions (me included) with no one around to answer them. On 16 Oct 2002, hao chen wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to convert relativ

Re: wget: relative link to non-relative

2002-10-16 Thread Daniel Webb
I've been watching this list for a couple of days, and I think it's just people asking questions (me included) with no one around to answer them. On 16 Oct 2002, hao chen wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to convert relative links to non-relative links with > wget? I searched through the manual a

wget: relative link to non-relative

2002-10-16 Thread hao chen
Hi, Is there a way to convert relative links to non-relative links with wget? I searched through the manual and help files and only found using -k to convert non-relative links but not the vice versa. Thanks. -- :=: :=: Hao Chen, Ph.D. :=: Postdoc :=: Department of Pharmacology :=: Universit