OK, so let's go back to basics for a moment.
wget's default behavior is to use all available bandwidth.
Is this the right thing to do?
Or is it better to back off a little after a bit?
Tony
On 10/13/07, Tony Godshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, so let's go back to basics for a moment.
>
> wget's default behavior is to use all available bandwidth.
>
> Is this the right thing to do?
>
> Or is it better to back off a little after a bit?
>
> Tony
IMO, this should be handled by the o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> On 10/13/07, Tony Godshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK, so let's go back to basics for a moment.
>>
>> wget's default behavior is to use all available bandwidth.
>>
>> Is this the right thing to do?
>>
>> Or is it better to back off a little
On 10/13/07, Josh Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/13/07, Tony Godshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK, so let's go back to basics for a moment.
> >
> > wget's default behavior is to use all available bandwidth.
> >
> > Is this the right thing to do?
> >
> > Or is it better to back of
On 10/13/07, Tony Godshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, you may have such problems but you are very much reaching in
> thinking that my --linux-percent has anything to do with any failing
> in linux.
>
> It's about dealing with unfair upstream switches, which, I'm quite
> sure, were not runni
On 10/13/07, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
> > On 10/13/07, Tony Godshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> OK, so let's go back to basics for a moment.
> >>
> >> wget's default behavior is to use all available bandwidth.
> >>
> >> Is t
On 10/13/07, Josh Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/13/07, Tony Godshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, you may have such problems but you are very much reaching in
> > thinking that my --linux-percent has anything to do with any failing
> > in linux.
> >
> > It's about dealing with
On 10/13/07, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
> > On 10/13/07, Tony Godshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> OK, so let's go back to basics for a moment.
> >>
> >> wget's default behavior is to use all available bandwidth.
> >>
> >> Is t
Tony Godshall wrote:
> If it was me, I'd have it default to backing off to 95% by default and
> have options for more aggressive behavior, like the multiple
> connections, etc.
I don't like a default back-off rule. I often encounter downloads with
often changing download speeds. The idea that the
On 10/17/07, Matthias Vill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony Godshall wrote:
> > If it was me, I'd have it default to backing off to 95% by default and
> > have options for more aggressive behavior, like the multiple
> > connections, etc.
>
> I don't like a default back-off rule. I often encounter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
(Accidentally sent private reply).
Tony Godshall wrote:
> On 10/17/07, Matthias Vill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Tony Godshall wrote:
>>> If it was me, I'd have it default to backing off to 95% by default and
>>> have options for more aggressive b
11 matches
Mail list logo