On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:50:57 +0600, dolphinling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, will the HTML 5 parsing section be of use here? Will it be of use to
things other than browsers? Are there small differences needed because
what's being parsed is a document fragment instead of a document? And
Hi,
The initial phase[1] section, on A DOCTYPE token marked as being correct,
says:
Append a DocumentType node to the Document node,
with the name attribute set to the name given in the
DOCTYPE token (which will be either html or HTML) [...]
...but given the DOCTYPE name state[2], won't
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Simon Pieters wrote:
The initial phase[1] section, on A DOCTYPE token marked as being correct,
says:
Append a DocumentType node to the Document node,
with the name attribute set to the name given in the
DOCTYPE token (which will be either html or HTML) [...]
So...
The first draft of the HTML5 Parsing spec is ready.
I plan to start implementing it at some point in the next few months, to
see how well it fares.
It is, in theory, more compatible with IE than Safari, Mozilla, and Opera,
but there are places where it makes intentional deviations
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:07:03 +0600, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first draft of the HTML5 Parsing spec is ready.
I think I'll have time to review it this week. Maybe I'll make a
proof-of-concept implementation in some scripting language.
It's not 100% complete. Some of the
