Wow. Pretty, uh, interesting.
Why not just have XmlHttpRequest configurable to not share cookies, not
share auth, not accept anything but xml, etc.?
> Does this allow improperly secured applications to be accessed?
> Application that are looking GET cannot be accessed because JSONRequest
only uses
Douglas Crockford wrote:
If application/json isn't acceptable (though I don't know why it
wouldn't be), then try a hyphen instead: application/json-request
The issue is to provide a way of identifying JSONRequest transactions
that cannot be confused with legacy applications.
To me, this just
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:15:38 +0700, Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Single select:
Is it conforming for an option to be both selected and disabled? (I
think it shouldn't be conforming.)
I think it should be allowed. It's useful for dummy items like "Select
your country" which is p
> If application/json isn't acceptable (though I don't know why it wouldn't
be), > then try a hyphen instead: application/json-request
I like application/json-request. That is a good suggestion.
The issue is to provide a way of identifying JSONRequest transactions that
cannot be confused with
Douglas Crockford wrote:
> I have modified the JSONRequest proposal so that the Content-Type in
> both directions must be application/json/request.
Er, why? Having two slashes in a content type is either extremely weird
or completely illegal (glancing at the RFC, I'm not certain which).
http://www
I have modified the JSONRequest proposal so that the Content-Type in both
directions must be application/json/request.
http://JSON.org/JSONRequest.html
Hi,
On 3/29/06, Arve Bersvendsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some of you have requested getPixel and setPixel for the bitmap canvas.
> Well, we have some news for you -- Opera has actually had this support all
> along, but we haven't been able to talk about it until now.
Interesting stuff! What
Single select:
Is it conforming for an option to be both selected and disabled? (I
think it shouldn't be conforming.)
And analogously: Is is conforming for a radio button to be both
checked and disabled if the whole set is not disabled? (This one is
harder to check, but anyway...)
Is it co
