Hi,
Shouldn't the Anything else entry in Comment end state[1] be a parse error?
As written, the following is allowed:
I thought it shouldn't for compability with the "SGML comments"
implementations.
[1] http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#comment1
Regards,
Simon Pieters
Hi,
The example for [1] seems to have a markup error:
Progress: 0%
Should the start tag be there?
In the same example there's also this:
<
...which probably should be "".
[1] http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-progress
Regards,
Simon Pieters
Hi,
I've been thinking about authoring tools and presentational markup. Forget
my earlier suggesetion to reuse instead of . :-)
If and don't represent bold and italics, then authroing tools will
most likely use and to represent bold and italics instead.
(This is already the case, even w
Hi,
From: Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Simon Pieters wrote:
>
> I've created a test suite for , , / and
> with the data types image/png, text/plain, text/html,
> application/xml and application/x-shockwave-flash, with the HTTP
> responces 200, 404, 410, 301 to 200, 301 t
Hi,
The conformance requirements section[1] states that:
HTML documents that use the new features described in this specification
and that are
served over the wire (e.g. by HTTP) must be sent as text/html and must
start with the
following DOCTYPE: .
So, if I read this correctly, HTML docume