Dave Raggett wrote:
> From your comments, you seem to be very confident of your scripting
> skills, [...]
Not really. It may be the case that others could code the same kind
of scripting in a clearer and more compact form.
> [...] and would have no problem in emulating my examples on top of
>
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Elliotte Harold wrote:
>
> Is the Web Apps 1.0 spec adhering to British or American spelling? I
> notice several occurrences of "labelled" which my dictionaries flag
> (should be labeled) but I think "labelled" is correct British spelling.
Right now I haven't made any effort
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>
> Some generic XML editors (e.g. oXygen) take liberties with reformatting
> whitespace by default. When whitespace is significant, the reformatting
> can be turned off using the xml:space='preserve' attribute.
>
> Since this editor artifact is harmless
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:15:38 -0500, Elliotte Harold
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is the Web Apps 1.0 spec adhering to British or American spelling? I
notice several occurrences of "labelled" which my dictionaries flag
(should be labeled) but I think "labelled" is correct British spelling.
Is the Web Apps 1.0 spec adhering to British or American spelling? I
notice several occurrences of "labelled" which my dictionaries flag
(should be labeled) but I think "labelled" is correct British spelling.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published!
http
On Jan 22, 2007, at 16:32, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Since this editor artifact is harmless in browsers and useful in
editors, it would be nice if the spec made it conforming at least
on the element in XHTML5.
Suggested text:
The xml:space attribute may be used on XHTML elements of XML
docume
Some generic XML editors (e.g. oXygen) take liberties with
reformatting whitespace by default. When whitespace is significant,
the reformatting can be turned off using the xml:space='preserve'
attribute.
Since this editor artifact is harmless in browsers and useful in
editors, it would be
Henri Sivonen wrote:
> (FWIW, my .bib has remarkably few items that have ISBNs.)
Do you mean your .bib is largely journal articles (which wouldn't have
ISBNs, since they aren't books) or that it mostly consists of books most
published before c. 1970? Or do you mean you or your cataloguing
softwar
On Jan 19, 2007, at 15:46, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
Henri Sivonen wrote:
My point was that BibTeX/LaTeX/TeXlipse users are already receptive
to the idea that they have to provide rich metadata for citations, so
a UI test would not be a matter of testing *if* they provide the data
but about
