d.latapie wrote:
>>> He was driving his parent´s blue car.
>>>
>>> Do you see any difference in relevance here? I don´t.
>>
>>That's because your example deliberately uses in a
>> frivolous manner.
>
> The example is not mine, it is WHATWG's.
It still sucks! ;)
> The question is: where
I went through the examples on http://www.w3.org/2006/11/XForms-Tiny/ to
find out which features "XForms Tiny" has that Web Forms 2 currently does
not have. I'm not sure how these features are supposed to be implemented
(saying this up front as Hixie already had a few interesting questions in
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:31:36 +0100, Alexey Feldgendler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But you can't make *each* of A, B, and C associated with *each* of X, Y
-- that's
what the example below does.
What about this?
ABC
XY
Sure you can:
ABC
X
Y
I'm not saying that a table *should* be
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 01:50:29 +0100, Simon Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK, in this example you're abusing rows, not columns.
> Rowspan and colspan allow you to make one cell be part of several rows or
> columns, which means that (by usnig only one dimention, and without using
> headers="
