Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:
I think there might be room to discuss the inclusion of default CSS
(perhaps even Aural CSS) fragments in the specification as well.
Yes, that will be defined in due course.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#rendering
P.S. There was no need to cross pos
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:59:47 +0100, Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* : the (old) way of activating Java. Probably must also die,
though I'm unsure about this one.
Why must it die? Browsers have to support it anyway, so documenting it
and letting it pass conformance checking seems
I've investigated a bit on the use of MPEG-4 as a baseline codec in the
proposed element, and my conclusion is that it can't be used with
the current licensing terms. From the AVC/H.264 Agreement[1]:
# For branded encoder and decoder products sold both to end users
# and on an OEM basis for
Since having informal Relax-NG schema fragments in the HTML specification
has been discussed, I think there might be room to discuss the inclusion
of default CSS (perhaps even Aural CSS) fragments in the specification as
well.
While HTML is a semantic markup language, it's not something to
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> If I remember correctly was suggested for this purpose on IRC. The
> advantage of over would be that people wouldn't easily think you
> could put anything inside (as you put almost anywhere).
We need to be careful with that. JAWS would probably read as
"bullet
Maciej Stachowiak schrieb:
> - They are technically superior to Ogg (seekable container format,
> significantly better bitrate for video)
Just to make sure no misunderstandings are generated: Of course Ogg is
seekable, even over HTTP (not just theoretically, but also in practice
as demonstrated b
