For compatibility with IE the parsing algorithm should probably ignore
tags.
Test case for the above proposal:
* { margin:0; padding:0; }
ul { background:red; }
li { background:lime; }
This line should be green.
--
Simon Pieters
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 03:28:35 +0200, Kornel Lesinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:10:07 +0100, Simon Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
We currently don't have interop with IE and other browsers with regards
to what to send to the server as the value of .
IE always s
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:10:07 +0100, Simon Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
We currently don't have interop with IE and other browsers with regards
to what to send to the server as the value of .
IE always sends .innerText as value.
IIRC it's innerHTML, but I can't verify it at the momen
We currently don't have interop with IE and other browsers with regards to
what to send to the server as the value of .
IE always sends .innerText as value.
Other browsers always send the contents of value="" as value, or the empty
string if it's missing (as per HTML4).
There may be conten
For compatibility with IE, should default to type=button instead
of type=submit.
--
Simon Pieters
On 4/12/07, Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael A. Puls II schrieb:
> ...
> If every browser supports .mht, I still don't think it's the best
> format for archiving.
> ...
What exactly is the problem with .mht (RFC2557)? Are they fixable? How
about trying to gather a group of peopl
