On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
> Here's a real-life example:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389437#c3
> Now if we refit Bugzilla for offline support, this will become something
> like
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi#id=389437,c3
> If we want the same UR
On 9/10/07, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> > That's an option, but then you can't use the fragment identifier for its
> > scroll-to behaviour when you use it to pass parameters.
>
> You can just pass the scroll position as one of the param
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
> That's an option, but then you can't use the fragment identifier for its
> scroll-to behaviour when you use it to pass parameters.
You can just pass the scroll position as one of the parameters.
> Also, when retrofitting an existing app, this r
On 9/8/07, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Given that you'd have to radically rewrite the app anyway to use an
> offline database instead of just using HTTP, why would we reuse the URI
> query syntax feature? It seems like it'd be better (from a consistency
> with existing specs point of
