Ian Hickson (9 oct. 2007 - 14:36) :
The W3C WebAPI working group is working on Widgets, so I'm going to
punt
on this as far as the HTML5 spec is concerned. Let me know if there's
anything that you still think belongs in HTML5 about this.
http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/
On Oct 8, 2007, at 22:12, Dave Singer wrote:
At 12:22 +0300 8/10/07, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Could someone who knows more about the production of audio
descriptions, please, comment if audio description can in practice
be implemented as a supplementary sound track that plays
concurrently
(This thread covered several topics. I'm focussing on the offline web apps
aspects only at the moment. I shall return to this thread in the future
for the other aspects.)
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Now that Google Gears http://gears.google.com/ has been announced, I'd
On Oct 8, 2007, at 22:52, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
I'm a bit confused about why W3C's Timed Text Candidate
Recommendation hasn't been mentioned in this thread, especially
given that Flash objects are the VIDEO element's biggest
competitor and Flash CS3's closed captioning component
On 10/9/07, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Chris Prince wrote:
That is correct. Gears starts serving a manifest's resources only when
everything has been successfully downloaded. If it gets a 404 it will
try again later.
So how does a page, once cached, stop
Henri Sivonen wrote:
In that case, an entire alternative soundtrack encoded using a
general-purpose codec would be called for. Is it reasonable to expect
content providers to take the bandwidth hit? Or should we expect content
providers to provide an entire alternative video file?
Just for
On Oct 8, 2007, at 22:05, Dave Singer wrote:
We suggested two ways to achieve captioning (a) by selection of
element, at the HTML level ('if you need captions, use this resource')
Makes sense to me in case of open captions burned onto the video track.
and (b) styling of elements at the HTML
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis schrieb:
I'm a bit confused about why W3C's Timed Text Candidate Recommendation
hasn't been mentioned in this thread, especially given that Flash
objects are the VIDEO element's biggest competitor and Flash CS3's
closed captioning component supports Timed Text. I haven't
At 10:03 +0300 9/10/07, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Oct 8, 2007, at 22:52, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
I'm a bit confused about why W3C's Timed Text Candidate
Recommendation hasn't been mentioned in this thread, especially
given that Flash objects are the VIDEO element's biggest
competitor and
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:03:41 +0200, Maik Merten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-ttaf1-dfxp-20061116/
Actually I wonder if it wouldn't make sense to have an attribute for
media elements specifying a URI for a file containing Timed Text. These
externally stored (not
On Oct 9, 2007, at 19:24, Dave Singer wrote:
At 10:03 +0300 9/10/07, Henri Sivonen wrote:
My understanding is that the purpose of this thread isn't to find
a captioning spec for HTML 5 but to find the right way to do
closed captions in Ogg.
Oh. I was under the impression that this thread
Hello,
according to http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#sqlresultset
the rows attribute should return a _native_ array of objects.
In the case of JavaScript, does that mean a native JavaScript Array
object or another object which can be indexed as an array? If it's the
At 9:22 +0300 9/10/07, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Oct 8, 2007, at 22:12, Dave Singer wrote:
At 12:22 +0300 8/10/07, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Could someone who knows more about the production of audio
descriptions, please, comment if audio description can in practice
be implemented as a
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Robert Sayre wrote:
Basically, I think offline caches should respect the Vary: HTTP header,
and maybe more. Applications will need to do this right anyway, if they
want to function correctly in the presence of ISP HTTP proxies (AOL,
TMobile, etc), corporate firewalls,
On 10/9/07, Dave Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the delivery is streaming, or in some other way where the
selection of tracks can be done prior to transport, then there isn't
a bandwidth hit at all, of course. Then the ask this resource to
present itself in the captioned fashion is a
On 10/9/07, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've now added an offline Web applications system to HTML5. Comments
welcome.
One small nit, swapCache() should probably set the state back to IDLE.
-dave
At 0:25 +0100 10/10/07, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves wrote:
On 10/9/07, Dave Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the delivery is streaming, or in some other way where the
selection of tracks can be done prior to transport, then there isn't
a bandwidth hit at all, of course. Then the ask this
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Could multi-page apps be addressed by letting applications specify
that other applications should be cached (using a similar api to the
one that lets applications programatically cache resources)?
I don't think that works very well -
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Aaron Boodman wrote:
In order to offline-enable bugzilla, you would first need to turn it
into an ajax-style application. Where you separate the UI template from
the data.
If you still want to keep the old URLs working, this basically means
capturing (and
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
1. Instead of using application attribute, move the declaration into a
separate head element, like link rel=application. This provides the
ability to reference multiple applications and also name each reference:
link rel=application
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Here are my thoughts on the problem of bugzilla and similar applications
with open-ended URI spaces.
1) It doesn't fit well with the URI model to treat the query part of the
URI specially. First, it's not in line with the web architecture
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Aaron Boodman wrote:
* If you're offline, and any of the caches have fallback pages
associated with a pattern that matches the URI of the resource
being fetched, then:
Not offline, but the request failed right? This shouldn't rely on
having the browser
22 matches
Mail list logo
