On Dec 10, 2007, at 5:46 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
I just checked in a change to make globalStorage far simpler -- I
dropped
all the domain manipulation stuff, and made it same-origin instead.
I also
dropped StorageItem and just made the Storage stuff return strings.
Perhaps the new globalStorage object should be renamed while making
this change? This will let us deprecate globalStorage a bit more
gracefully (clients checking for its existence won't get an object
that behaves differently than expected).
Perhaps "localStorage"?
That still won't help users of StorageItem.value, but it might be
useful anyway.
-dave
