Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Dan Brickley wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
FYI, Anne van Kesteren was just invited to join the WHATWG membership (as
defined by our charter, basically that's the small group of people whom I
have to answer to in my role as editor). He was invited due
On Mar 31, 2008, at 08:10, Nicholas C. Zakas wrote:
@irrelevant is virtually indistinguishable from setting content to
display: none. My point in bringing up accessibility with a possible
attribute or element is to figure out where the lines between HTML
and CSS are, as it appears HTML 5
Hi,
I was thinking about some preprocessing of images before they are
uploaded to server. Typical example is unexperienced user who wants to
upload whole set of photos from birthday party. Every photo has
unnecessary huge proportions and will be resized immediately after
upload. What if UA could
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:44:54 -0700, Filip Likavcan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking about some preprocessing of images before they are
uploaded to server. Typical example is unexperienced user who wants to
upload whole set of photos from birthday party. Every photo has
unnecessary huge
I notice that HTML5's video section is incomplete and lacking.
The text under 3.12.7.1 could have been written ten years ago:
It would be helpful for interoperability if all browsers could
support the same codecs. However, there are no known codecs that
satisfy all the current players: we
Robert J Crisler wrote:
The text under 3.12.7.1 could have been written ten years ago:
It would be helpful for interoperability if all browsers could support
the same codecs. However, there are no known codecs that satisfy all the
current players: we need a codec that is known to not require
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Dan Brickley wrote:
There's no public accountability for this group, no. It's roughly
equivalent to W3C staff, except that it is not a paid position.
W3C staff report through a variety of documented means to their
stakeholders (including at regular events, Web
So given all of this, is it reasonable to expect HTML 5 to provide something
for this use case? Perhaps my suggestions of @noview introduces incorrect
semantics, perhaps something along the lines of @important to indicate content
is important regardless of style (and so screen readers should
I'm not saying that the MPEG codecs meet the 3.12.7.1 requirements. I'm
saying that ISO/IEC MPEG standards are vastly preferable to the nonstandard,
single-company junk that web developers are saddled with now. The W3C need
not abandon its ideals to declare that MPEG standards are better than the
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Robert J Crisler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The issue of a small licensing fee didn't stop MPEG 1 Part 3 from becoming
the ubiquitous world standard for audio.
MP3 because an ISO/IEC standard in 1991, but patent enforcement did
not happen until 1998, until which
10 matches
Mail list logo
