On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Eduard Pascual wrote:
Can somebody put forward any technical argument against this idea?
For my benefit, could you succintly summarise the changes that this would
involve to the spec? (Not the exact wording, but a basic overview of what
you see being added or changed.)
I can't say for sure if this is an issue from the spec document
itself, or just a rendering bug on my browser (FF 3.0.3), but here it
goes:
Within the section 4.3.1 The script element, on the algorythm
labeled Running a script, step 6, the text for the first condition
shows overlapped, each line
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Eduard Pascual wrote:
Can somebody put forward any technical argument against this idea?
For my benefit, could you succintly summarise the changes that this would
involve to the spec? I'm not sure I
(whatwg, please see last bit.)
2008/11/9 Jukka K. Korpela [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
Paul Arzul wrote:
CSS defines when properties are applicable (see the Applies column:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/propidx.html)
Should we generate warnings when properties are not
