On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Giorgio Maone wrote:
> It would make clickjacking attacks more precise, by exactly positioning the
> frame content where the attacker wants it to be.
> Not that you cannot already be pixel-precise by using absolute positioning
> inside an overflow: hidden div...
> L
Ogg based media resources can start from a time position that is not
zero. Examples of files that do this are those generated by the
program oggz-chop. For example:
http://ia331342.us.archive.org/2/items/night_of_the_living_dead/night_of_the_living_dead.ogv?t=0:20:00/0:20:50
If this is played in
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Kartikaya Gupta
wrote:
> Also, the following words appear with different spelling variations; I
> suggest one of the variants be picked and used consistently:
>
> behaviour vs. behavior
> favorite vs. favourite
> honour vs. honor
> occurance[s] vs. occurrence[s]
T
Giovanni Campagna:
- The second paragraph in 2.4.5.6 is hard to understand because the
verb is at the end. I would rewrite as
"A week-year with a number *yr* has 53 weeks if corresponds to a
year *yr* in the proleptic Gregorian calendar that has a Thursday
as its first day (January 1st), or i
I ran the spec through a typo-finder program I cooked up and it found these
among lots of false positives.
altogther (4.8.2.1.13)
approprate (5.8.4)
argments (4.8.11.1.10)
asychronously (5.8.4)
attribue's (2 in 4.6.12)
attrbutes (4.10.4)
constaints (4.10.14.2, 2 in 4.10.14.3)
elemnt (4.10.14.3)
e
The specification forbids the authors using undefined elements and
attributes; a document containing classid will not be valid. Still, the
site hosting the controls will need a way to test validity of pages for QA.
Chris
On , Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
> Character set x-x-big5 cannot be registered because it is private.
>
> Now that classid is gone, what will be the workaround for ActiveX objects
> where they are needed?
>
classid is nevertheless proprietary, and no other user agent but IE will
require it (unle
Character set x-x-big5 cannot be registered because it is private.
Now that classid is gone, what will be the workaround for ActiveX objects
where they are needed?
1. Ask Windows browsers to support
Type="application/x-oleobject;classid=..."?
2. Use a custom DTD with classid fo
A few comments, as requested by Ian Hickson.
- End of 2.2.1, a typo: JavsScript instead of Javascript
- From section 2.4.2 I don't understand if boolean attributes with
invalid values represent "true" or "false". In addition, I don't
understand if an empty value is false (as in XHTML1.0) or true