First of all, thanks for the time taken to review the document and to
post your feedback. I truly appreciate it.
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Toby A Inkster wrote:
> In part 0.1 you include some HTML and some RDF triples that you'd like to
> mark up in the HTML and conclude that RDFa is incap
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> [...]
> But may be, after all, it ain't so bad. It is good to have the opportunity.
> :-)
This is the exactly the point (at least, IMO): RDFa may be quite good
at embedding inline metadata, but can't deal at all with describing
the sema
Geoffrey Sneddon On 09-05-16 21.38:
On 16 May 2009, at 07:08, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
Geoffrey Sneddon Fri May 15 14:27:03 PDT 2009
On 15 May 2009, at 18:25, Shelley Powers wrote:
> One of the very first uses of RDF, in RSS 1.0, for feeds, is
still > in existence, still viable. You don't
Section 10.1, "Writing XHTML documents" observes: "According to the XML
specification, XML processors are not guaranteed to process the external
DTD subset referenced in the DOCTYPE."
While this is true, since no doubt the majority of web browsers are
already able to process external styleshee
