On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, pamela fox wrote:
I was looking through the ApplicationCache API description (e.g.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#handler-appcache-onnoupdate)
and am trying to figure out, as a web developer, what my code might look
like for using
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Rikkert Koppes wrote:
The content models [1] section is pretty clear, however, whenever one
wants to know which elements fall into a specific content model, one has
to look at the categories definition of each element.
A (possibly non normative) overview would be
What's the audience for this section? (Apologies if this has been
covered elsewhere.)
If the intended readers are new to HTML, as implied, then technical
words and concepts shouldn't be introduced without explanation.
For example:
The tree formed by an HTML document in this way is turned
spec says A header element typically contains the section's heading (an
h1–h6 element or an hgroup element), but can also contain other content
I read this as other meaning different - e.g., header doesn't need to
contain an h1–h6 element or an hgroup element. Others I know read other
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Bruce Lawsonbru...@opera.com wrote:
spec says A header element typically contains the section's heading (an
h1–h6 element or an hgroup element), but can also contain other content
I read this as other meaning different - e.g., header doesn't need to
contain
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jeff Walden
jwalden+wha...@mit.edujwalden%2bwha...@mit.edu
wrote:
On 26.6.09 16:49, Michael Nordman wrote:
Progress bars are routinely implemented without get hi-level application
acks from the other side. XMLHttpRequest.upload.onprogress is one such
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Ojan Vafai wrote:
I'm suggesting an addition to cross-domain (i)frames that allows
scrolling specific content into view. The use case is sites that
aggregate data from many sites (e.g. search engines)
[This message is bcc'ed to around 100 people who at some point or other
sent comments to the WHATWG list on this topic.]
After an inordinate amount of discussions, both in public and privately,
on the situation regarding codecs for video and audio in HTML5, I have
reluctantly come to the
At 2009-06-30T04:50:31+, Ian Hickson wrote:
The situation for audio codecs is similar, but less critical as there are
more formats. Since audio has a much lower profile than video, I propose
to observe the audio feature and see if any common codecs surface, instead
of specifically
Matthew Gregan:
The reason for not selecting a video codec doesn't seem to have much weight
when considering Ogg Vorbis as a required audio codec. Apple's submarine
patent argument doesn't seem to hold, as many deep-pocketed companies
(including Microsoft) have shipped products with Vorbis
10 matches
Mail list logo
