On 10/08/2009 04:05, Remco wrote:
A title is a short description, and could be the movie title in the
case of a video element.
WCAG 2 1.1.1 requires that:
If non-text content is time-based media, then text alternatives at
least provide descriptive identification of the non-text content.
Hi Sam,
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 03:23:15PM +0100, Sam Dutton wrote:
As an aside to Chris McCormick's comments, I wonder if it might also be
useful/possible/appropriate (or not) to provide access to media data in the
way that the ActionScript computeSpectrum function does:
PROPOSAL
When the user drags-and-drops files onto a web page, we should expose
those files to the page via a files accessor on the dataTransfer
property of the event object. This feature is consistent with HTML
5's security model for drag and drop.
I wasn't clear on this part -- how is the
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Benjamin
Hawkes-Lewisbhawkesle...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 10/08/2009 04:05, Remco wrote:
A title is a short description, and could be the movie title in the
case of a video element.
WCAG 2 1.1.1 requires that:
If non-text content is time-based media, then
Charles McCathieNevile wrote on 8/6/2009 2:24 PM:
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:12:07 -0400, Manu Sporny
mspo...@digitalbazaar.com wrote:
The test ensures that attributes originating in the markup of an HTML4
document are preserved by the HTML parser and are preserved in the DOM.
[...]
On 10/08/2009 15:42, Remco wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Benjamin
Hawkes-Lewisbhawkesle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Do these features meet your requirements? If not, why not?
A longdesc is not the same as an alt, in that a longdesc is a long
description of the content, while an alt
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
I've reworded it to imply only one mutation event fires.
Thanks.
2) (using the class attribute for the discussion) What should happen when you
do a remove(foo) on an element which has no class attribute?
My understanding is
TO SUMMARIZE:
-There are many other existing ways to notify
-I'd suggest browsers have a Notification process with which open tabs
register.
-Registered open tabs could tell the browser to pop up a notification,
perhaps with title text, body text, and image
-Clicking the notification would
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
Do either of you have a minimum font size preference set?
Yes, I have a 16 point minimum font size set; and removing that moved
the boxes out of the way. It also made the text in the boxes so small
as to be noticeably more
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote on 8/10/2009 1:26 PM:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
Do either of you have a minimum font size preference set?
Yes, I have a 16 point minimum font size set; and removing that moved
the boxes out of the way. It also made the
At 11:22 +1000 10/08/09, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
I'd be curious to hear what those problems and provisions are for
video and audio.
I'm just referring to the rather extensive disciussion of 'alt' for
images, and the concern some have with attributes that 'most' people
don't see.
I do agree
From: John Gregg
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 12:54 PM
I think it's appeared on this thread before, but I'm currently working on an
API to provide desktop notifications. A patch has been proposed to WebKit at
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25463.
I had originally proposed it to
I have no opinion on the need being adequately covered by other attributes, but…
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Remcoremc...@gmail.com wrote:
For an image this usually works well. An image usually doesn't convey
a lot of meaning. It can be replaced by a simple sentence like A
young dog plays
Am Montag, den 10.08.2009, 13:38 -0500 schrieb Bil Corry:
As an alternative, in FF and IE (and probably other UAs), you can use
ctrl-plus and ctrl-minus to grow and shrink the page content.
Or, the stylesheet could just properly depend on the fontsize, eg. by
using EM units.
--
Nils Dagsson
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Smylers wrote:
I experienced this recently with a minimum font size set (in Firefox). I
tracked it down to something like this (sorry, that was on another
computer, so this is from memory):
* The main content's left margin, in which the boxes have to fit, is
For example, while strongly discouraged to do so, an implementation
Foo Browser could add a new DOM attribute fooTypeTime to a
control's DOM interface that returned the time it took the user to
select the current value of a control (say).
while strongly discouraged to do so -- while strongly
This specification defines several comparison operators for strings.
Really, operators? Is this the right word here? Maybe it should be
several comparison operations on strings or several possible
comparisons for strings.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elh...@ibiblio.org
As with the previous algorithms, when this one is invoked, the steps
must be followed in the order given, aborting at the first step that
returns something.
I suggest deleting when this one is invoked. It doesn't really add anything.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elh...@ibiblio.org
Extensions must be defined so that the use of extensions does not
contradict nor cause the non-conformance of functionality defined in
the specification.
should be either
Extensions must be defined so that the use of extensions neither
contradicts nor causes the non-conformance of functionality
From: John Gregg
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 2:34 PM
Michael Kozakewich wrote:
Are notifications really a renderer problem, as opposed to a browser-UI
problem? (e.g. 'Safari' or 'Chromium', rather than 'Webkit')
Also, I don't know of any notifications (Outlook, Messenger, AVG,
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Web Apps 1.0 references RFC 3066. However, IANA seems to behave as if a
successor for the RFC had already been approved. The successor draft is
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltru-registry-14.txt
Is it safe to expect Web Apps 1.0
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
* Ian Hickson wrote:
2.14.1.1.
The spec should probably mention
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoehrmann-script-types-03.txt or
its
successor around here.
I have no idea which section that was, nor which RFC that is (the URI is
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Christian Schmidt wrote:
Ian Hickson skrev:
On Sat, 1 Jan 2005, Matthew Thomas wrote:
55. http://devedge.netscape.com/library/manuals/2000/javascript/1.3/
reference/index.html has been unavailable throughout the period I was
reviewing this spec. Perhaps
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
#terminology:
For readability, the term URI is used to refer to both ASCII URIs and
Unicode IRIs, as those terms are defined by RFC 3986 and RFC 3987
respectively, and as modified by RFC 2732.
RFC 2732 is irrelevant, as URIs as of RFC 3986 and
In recent news, Google may be about to open source On2 codecs, perhaps
creating a route out of the HTML 5 video codec deadlock:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/06/google_vp6_open_source/
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Alex Bishop wrote:
In several places in HTML5 (specifically, sections 3.3.3.3, 4.2.5.3 and
5.11.1), the specification states that certain attribute values must be
valid RFC 3066 language codes.
However, RFC 3066 was replaced by RFC 4646 (and RFC 4647) in September
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:59:11 +0200, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de
wrote:
- the literal letters T and Z must be uppercase
Any technical reason why they have to?
Any reason why they don't?
It simplifies processing a tiny amount.
Perhaps Google will finally be able to break this horrible deadlock by doing
just that. :)
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Sam Kuper sam.ku...@uclmail.net wrote:
In recent news, Google may be about to open source On2 codecs, perhaps
creating a route out of the HTML 5 video codec deadlock:
Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2009, 00:44 +0100 schrieb Sam Kuper:
In recent news, Google may be about to open source On2 codecs, perhaps
creating a route out of the HTML 5 video codec deadlock:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/06/google_vp6_open_source/
At this point, this seems to be pure
Hi Everyone,
I've been off the list for quite some time, so bear with me if I missed
something searching the archives.
I've been looking at the meter element, which specifically states that
There is no explicit way to specify units in the meter element, but the
units may be specified in the
30 matches
Mail list logo
