2009-10-03 21:47, Tab Atkins Jr. skrev:
Well, no amount of proof would do so; only a convincing enough
argument. I, personally, do not feel thatdt's semantics change
betweendl anddetails. Nor do I feel they have different syntax
at all -dl anddetails do have slightly different syntaxes,
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Neither dialog nor meter were added because they are expected to
be used in great numbers. Both were added to prevent another element
from being _mis_used. (Specifically, dialog takes away from the risk
of people marking up dialogs as
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Wellington Fernando de Macedo wrote:
Ian, do you intend to add any other features to the first version of
WebSocket? If yes, which ones?
I was thinking of adding multiplexing, but after discussing this with a
variety of people, I'm leaning towards leaving the protocol as
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Keryx Web webmas...@keryx.se wrote:
I am arguing in favor of introducing a new element, which would be the zero
cost solution, since details is new anyway.
It's not a zero-cost solution, though. It introduces *another* nearly
identical heading-type element to
On 04/10/2009 15:51, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
dt only requires extra hacks in two browsers that are on the way
out. Given a little bit more time they'll be gone completely, and we
can stop worrying about this.
I'm sorry but you are really understating the problem here.
-dean
On 04/10/2009 18:11, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Dean Edwardsdean.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/10/2009 15:51, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
dtonly requires extra hacks in two browsers that are on the way
out. Given a little bit more time they'll be gone completely,
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon
foolist...@googlemail.com wrote:
Apparently Hixie had previously said he didn't want to change this as it
will become a non-issue over time. I think it does matter due to the
security issues it
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Sebastian Markb�ge wrote:
No browser has implemented the copy/paste part of the spec.
Few parts of the spec are perfectly implemented anywhere today, indeed.
That's what it'll take years to get to -- that's where the 2022 estimate
comes from, in fact -- I doubt we'll
