Re: [whatwg] Microdata DOM API issues

2009-11-13 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > The itemref mechanism allows creating arbitrary graphs of items, rather than > the tree of items that is the intended microdata model (right?). Even though > my default reaction to graphs is "oh cool", for microdata when the domain > mode

Re: [whatwg] Microdata DOM API issues

2009-11-13 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:27:39 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:23:54 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: Why are the algorithms for extracting RDF gone? All that's left is the book example with the equivalent Turtle, but it would be nice if it were actually defined ho

Re: [whatwg] Microdata DOM API issues

2009-11-13 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:23:54 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: Why are the algorithms for extracting RDF gone? All that's left is the book example with the equivalent Turtle, but it would be nice if it were actually defined how to extract RDF. The same for the JSON stuff, was that no good?

Re: [whatwg] AJAX History Concerns

2009-11-13 Thread Justin Lebar
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > The idea is that the string you would put into the back button or history > menu is not the same as the string you would put into the title bar or > bookmarks (i.e. not the same as ). That doesn't seem too unreasonable, but I think it's strang