On Mar 12, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Jonas Sicking
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:38 PM, David Levin
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Jonas Sicking
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Hunt
wrote:
On Mar 12, 201
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:38 PM, David Levin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mar 12, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Hunt
wrote:
On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I'm not saying that the proposed API is bad. It just doesn't seem to
solve the (seemingly most commonly requested) use case of
rotating/
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:38 PM, David Levin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> >> I'm not saying that the proposed API is bad. It just doesn
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >> I'm not saying that the proposed API is bad. It just doesn't seem to
> >> solve the (seemingly most commonly requested) use
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
>
> On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> I'm not saying that the proposed API is bad. It just doesn't seem to
>> solve the (seemingly most commonly requested) use case of
>> rotating/scaling images. So if we want to solve those
On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> I'm not saying that the proposed API is bad. It just doesn't seem to
> solve the (seemingly most commonly requested) use case of
> rotating/scaling images. So if we want to solve those use cases we
> need to either come up with a separate API fo
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:57 AM, David Levin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> What is the use case for this? It seems like in most cases you'll want
> >> to display something on screen to the use
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:57 AM, David Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> What is the use case for this? It seems like in most cases you'll want
>> to display something on screen to the user, and so the difference
>> comes down to shipping drawing commands
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, David Levin wrote:
> >
> > I've talked with some other folks on WebKit (Maciej and Oliver) about
> > having a canvas that is available to workers. They suggested some nice
> > modifications to make it an offscreen canva
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Drew Wilson wrote:
> Do we feel that text APIs are, in general, difficult to implement in a
> multi-thread safe manner?
>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Michael Nordman
wrote:
> The lack of support for text drawing in the worker context seems like a
> shor
2010/3/12 Henri Sivonen :
> On Mar 11, 2010, at 20:18, Mike Samuel wrote:
>
>> I think I can probably do without new HTML5 stuff.
>
> OK. One supplemental point:
>
> On Mar 10, 2010, at 20:15, Mike Samuel wrote:
>
>> document.write can be wrapped. But the wrapper would still need to
>> know the in
On Mar 11, 2010, at 20:18, Mike Samuel wrote:
> I think I can probably do without new HTML5 stuff.
OK. One supplemental point:
On Mar 10, 2010, at 20:15, Mike Samuel wrote:
> document.write can be wrapped. But the wrapper would still need to
> know the insertion-mode.
> If the insertion mode w
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 23:50 -0800, Michal Zalewski wrote:
> > Servers are already free to obtain and mix in content from other sites, so
> > why can't client-side HTML JavaScript be similarly empowered?
>
> I can see two reasons:
>
> 1) Users may not be happy about the ability for web applicatio
14 matches
Mail list logo
