On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Mike Wilson wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Mike Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll keep this short as there is more recent discussion:
> > > 2) The pageStorage object is one incarnation of [a key
> > >value store] solving the dependency problem that appea
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Justin Lebar wrote:
> >
> > That's not quite how I would describe it. It's more that each entry in
> > the session history has a URL and optionally some data. The data can
> > be used for two main purposes: first, storing a preparsed description
> > of the state in the URL
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Stef Epardaud wrote:
>
> I'm trying to implement the picture reordering feature of picasa in
> HTML5 and I'm having several problems.
>
> The feature is as follows:
>
> - I have a list of small pictures arranged in a sequence of lines
> - I can select or unselect pictures b
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Roland Steiner wrote:
>
> Since I am currently in the process of fixing bugs in this area for
> Chrome, there are 2 things I'm wondering about:
>
> .) whether "Text" and "URL" should be part of the return value of
> "types" (probably not, according to Ian's comment). However,
This is getting fairly tiresome. If you're interested in continuing this
thread, please actually read the replies thus far and directly respond to
the points rather than re-stating what's already been rebutted.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Paul Kinlan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a specific use-
Hi,
I have a specific use-case where encryption is required, and currently the
only solution is to find a JS library that can encrypt the data on the way
in or way out of storage.
The main cases I have:
1. Storage needs to be encrypted on disk, device etc.
2. Data needs to be in decrypted
On 4/5/10 3:21 PM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering why the [PutForwards=value] extended attribute is needed
for the htmlFor output element attribute ?
It is making things pretty ugly for a need I do not really get.
Thanks,
--
Mounir
I agree. In general PutForwards makes APIs strange,
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:22 AM, Niklas Beischer wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 20:43:57 +0300, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/31/10 6:57 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I would expect that send() is allowed to start streaming data ove
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 20:43:57 +0300, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 3/31/10 6:57 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I would expect that send() is allowed to start streaming data over the
network as soon as it can, but only update bufferedAmount from the
ev
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Saurabh Jain wrote:
Hi,
>
> I have a proposal for adding generic image collision API in Canvas. Given
> two images HTMLImageElement objects and there respective x, y, clip width
> and clip height the API call will let you know if there's any
> non-transparent pixel
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> >> I don't think this is enough of a
> >> problem to kill the feature though.
> >
> > I think this is a good feature to try and integrate into existing APIs if
> > it's possible to do so
WebSockets constructor:
[[
4. Let origin be the ASCII serialization of the origin of the script that
invoked the WebSocket() constructor, converted to ASCII lowercase.
...
6. Establish a WebSocket connection...
]]
which says
[[
13. Add the string consisting of the concatenation of the string
12 matches
Mail list logo
