On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> These quotas are often global, some kind of user setting, or are
>> per-origin. Application Caches are missing such a quota.
>>
>> The entire "Disk Space" section of Web SQL Databases could equally apply
>> to Application Caches: http://dev.w3.
Hello all,
I have a couple questions about the storage spec (I'm reading the August 10th
version at (http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/)).
(1) The spec says:
"The object's indices of the supported indexed properties are the numbers in
the range zero to one less than the number of key/value pa
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Zachary Ozer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
> > It's good to have thought this through. I agree, this isn't a workable
> > solution, since the whole bandwidth switching logic is introduced into
> the
> > browsers, when in fact i
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Mihai Parparita wrote:
> > https://webkit.org/b/42861 has more tests, but briefly, the behavior
> > in the latest stable versions of these browser is:
> > - Firefox will not create a session history entry if the navigation
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Mike Wilson wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > Mike Wilson wrote:
> > > the semantic contract is coming closer and closer to that of the
> > > other storage APIs, so I think it would be an advantage to use the
> > > same interface as well.
> >
> > I don't see the relevance of st
Greetings,
The specification says that the dragenter event is "used to determine
whether or not the drop target is to accept the drop". Do functions bound
to this event get any information about the object being dragged? In
particular, is there a good way to have N drop targets, and have each of
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:24:10 +0200, Mike Wilcox
wrote:
I'm perplexed at the resistance. We've tried telling our clients not to
use IE6, "IE8 is much faster". But inevitably, we have to make it work.
This is not nytimes.com. There's http://whatwg.org/html and
http://whatwg.org/C available f
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Shwetank Dixit wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:28:55 +0530, Lianghui Chen wrote:
> >
> > In spec HTML5 for offline web application
> > (http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#offline) chapter
> > 6.6.6, item 3, 4, 5 state that for resources that is in online
> >
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
>
> There seems to be a race condition in how application cache groups are
> marked obsolete. Consider the following scenario:
>
> 1. A document is loaded from server, an appcache is fully created.
> 2. Appcache update is initiated (e.g. by calling
On 8/12/10 4:32 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
CSS implicitly states that negative list-marker values are allowed, as
negative numbers are discussed in the Lists module. Opera's behavior
should be the correct one here.
Just as a note, Gecko's code to imposing a lower bound of 0 on @value> goes back
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> The HTML5 spec doesn't say UAs should treat different
> from a negative value specified for any long. For example, a get on
> the reflected attribute li.value should return "-1". In this test
> case:
>
>
>
> var el = document.createEle
The HTML5 spec doesn't say UAs should treat different
from a negative value specified for any long. For example, a get on
the reflected attribute li.value should return "-1". In this test
case:
var el = document.createElement("li");
el.setAttribute("value", "-1");
alert(el.value);
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> The script setting the value doesn't set the dirty flag. The only way this
> could be a problem is if the user edits the control and _then_ the script
> sets the value to an overlong value.
"""
value
On getting, it must return the current valu
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Brett Zamir wrote:
> On 8/12/2010 4:19 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Brett Zamir wrote:
>>> Might there be a way that tags could add an attribute which
>>> combined the meaning of both "defer" and "document.write", whereby the
>>> last statement
On 8/12/10 10:59 AM, David Flanagan wrote:
But if you don't talk about the algebraic operations then you haven't
really defined what a transformation is, have you?
Given that the input is in coordinates, we need to talk about algebraic
operations to define the transformation on vectors those c
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> It's good to have thought this through. I agree, this isn't a workable
> solution, since the whole bandwidth switching logic is introduced into the
> browsers, when in fact it should happen in the media framework with
> information from the
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 8/11/10 5:42 PM, David Flanagan wrote:
I think that the sentence "The transformations must be performed in
reverse order" is sufficient to remove the ambiguity in multiplication
order.
It is? It sounds pretty confusing to me... reverse from what?
I agree that it is c
There exist well tested and respected algorithms to reliably and easily
convert Gregorian calendar dates (and times of day) to a variety of
forms, including Julian Day Numbers (a real (versus integer) count of
the days and fractions of days from some epoch).
Such conversions are not a readily
I'm perplexed at the resistance. We've tried telling our clients not to use
IE6, "IE8 is much faster". But inevitably, we have to make it work.
Mike Wilcox
http://clubajax.org
m...@mikewilcox.net
On Aug 11, 2010, at 8:29 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 8/11/10 9:17 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
>> O
On 8/12/2010 4:19 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Brett Zamir wrote:
Might there be a way that tags could add an attribute which
combined the meaning of both "defer" and "document.write", whereby the
last statement was evaluated to a string, but ideally treated, as far as
the DOM,
2010-08-11 12:31 EEST: Jonas Sicking:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Mikko Rantalainen
> wrote:
>> Stuff I don't want to see (combined with @required):
>>
>> - first option is always special
>> - empty string as the value is special
>> - option without a value is special
>
> Do you consider i
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Brett Zamir wrote:
>
> Might there be a way that tags could add an attribute which
> combined the meaning of both "defer" and "document.write", whereby the
> last statement was evaluated to a string, but ideally treated, as far as
> the DOM, with the string being parsed and
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:11:55 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Philip Jägenstedt
wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:38:32 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Philip Jägenstedt
>wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010
23 matches
Mail list logo