Hi Ian, all,
I am very excited by the possibilities that Ian outlined for WebVTT
and how we can add V2 features.
I have some comments on the discussion below, but first I'd like to
point people to a piece of work that Ronny Mennerich from
LeanbackPlayer has recently undertaken (with a little of m
On 6/5/11, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>> Why need they be? This isn't Bittorrent.
> I think you completely misunderstood my mail... the point is that
> browses do NOT all use the last non-empty path component; some try to
> guess a filename based on the query params, in various ways.
No, I understood -
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> Things like radio buttons and checkboxes are small, and hard targets
> to hit with a mouse. It's much nicer to be able to be able to click
> anywhere in the whole label. It requires less effort.
Oops, I misunderstood the case we were talking
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> I've added equivalent text back. It describes the Opera/IE behaviour;
> could you elaborate on why the WebKit behaviour is better?
>
> Authors can emulate the WebKit behaviour if they really want it by just
> calling .click() on the element they
On 6/3/11 2:58 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
On 6/3/11, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 6/3/11 11:46 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
Note that some browsers will do weird parsing of the query params to
attempt to extract a "useful filename". That seems strictly worse than
just using Content-Disposition
