Re: [whatwg] Peer-to-peer communication, video conferencing, , and related topics

2011-07-05 Thread Rob Manson
There are also tablet devices with stereo cameras on the back and single on the front too. Stereo will become increasingly common. roBman On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 10:55 +0530, Shwetank Dixit wrote: > On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:32:49 +0530, Lachlan Hunt > wrote: > > > On 2011-03-18 05:45, Ian Hick

Re: [whatwg] Peer-to-peer communication, video conferencing, , and related topics

2011-07-05 Thread Shwetank Dixit
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:32:49 +0530, Lachlan Hunt wrote: On 2011-03-18 05:45, Ian Hickson wrote: On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Jonathan Dixon wrote: Further, it could be useful to provide a way to query the video source as to whether the camera is oriented relative to the screen (if the underlying sy

Re: [whatwg] Proposal to extend registerProtocolHandler

2011-07-05 Thread Robert O'Callahan
I don't think browsers need to prompt for registerProtocolHandler. Instead, I would simply allow any site to register as a protocol handler for almost anything, and remember all such registrations. When the user navigates to a URI whose protocol has had an app newly registered for it since the last

Re: [whatwg] Proposal to extend registerProtocolHandler

2011-07-05 Thread Peter Kasting
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Yes, I'm not saying in-page click is a solution. It works for popups, sort > of, but I don't think it does for permission request notifications. > To be truly honest, requiring a user gesture probably doesn't work for rPH() because it doesn

Re: [whatwg] Proposal to extend registerProtocolHandler

2011-07-05 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 7/5/11 5:04 PM, Michael Davidson wrote: If the asking for permission can happen in a context in which the user can't tell what's being asked for, it's a really bad idea... Can you clarify what you mean? Requiring an in-page click doesn't mean that the user understands either. Maliciou

Re: [whatwg] Proposal to extend registerProtocolHandler

2011-07-05 Thread Michael Davidson
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 7/5/11 4:48 PM, Michael Davidson wrote: > >> Granting permission, yes. But just asking for permission? >> > > If the asking for permission can happen in a context in which the user > can't tell what's being asked for, it's a really bad ide

Re: [whatwg] Proposal to extend registerProtocolHandler

2011-07-05 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 7/5/11 4:48 PM, Michael Davidson wrote: Granting permission, yes. But just asking for permission? If the asking for permission can happen in a context in which the user can't tell what's being asked for, it's a really bad idea... I say it's less annoying because (in Chrome, anyway), the

Re: [whatwg] Proposal to extend registerProtocolHandler

2011-07-05 Thread Michael Davidson
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > so I don't think the same standards should apply. >> > > If anything, persistent permission grants should have a _higher_ bar than > opening a temporary pop-up window... > > Granting permission, yes. But just asking for permission? I say

Re: [whatwg] Proposal to extend registerProtocolHandler

2011-07-05 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 7/5/11 3:58 PM, Michael Davidson wrote: Prompting for permissions is much less annoying than opening a new window That's unclear. Especially if permission grants are persistent. so I don't think the same standards should apply. If anything, persistent permission grants should have a _hi

Re: [whatwg] Proposal to extend registerProtocolHandler

2011-07-05 Thread Michael Davidson
For rPH, please don't require a user-initiated click for the call. That's one very annoying thing about notifications - it takes users two clicks to enable them, and every app has to find some suitable in-page UI to ask users to make the first click. Since both notifications and rPH are confirmed b

Re: [whatwg] Using footer in blockquote for attribution

2011-07-05 Thread Jukka K. Korpela
2011-07-01 11:26, Simon Pieters wrote: Simon felt that “Content inside a blockquote must be quoted from another source” excludes footer. s/footer/attribution/ Indeed since it's a conformance requirement, in valid documents the content inside blockquote is quoted from another source. If the sp

Re: [whatwg] Proposal to extend registerProtocolHandler

2011-07-05 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:41:13 +0200, Peter Kasting wrote: In general, I echo Michael's comment that we follow the notifications model. That means using http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/perms/FeaturePermissions.html I take it? I am still somewhat dubious about that idea given http://weblogs.mozi

Re: [whatwg] Proposal to extend registerProtocolHandler

2011-07-05 Thread Rich Tibbett
Rich Tibbett wrote: Peter Kasting wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote: Do any browser vendors agree with this or have objections? From my work on the Chrome UI side of this, I would very much like to see something like isRegistered(). This would allow sites to conditio

Re: [whatwg] Proposal to extend registerProtocolHandler

2011-07-05 Thread Rich Tibbett
Peter Kasting wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote: Do any browser vendors agree with this or have objections? From my work on the Chrome UI side of this, I would very much like to see something like isRegistered(). This would allow sites to conditionalize requests for