[whatwg] You can now subscribe to changes to the WHATWG spec on a per-topic basis

2011-11-22 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > > > Another option is for someone (possibly me) to create a system whereby > > people can subscribe to specific portions of the specification, and > > for a tool to detect when a diff affects that portion and e-mail them. > > I'm not exactly sure ho

Re: [whatwg] Using requestFileSystem to setup mounts

2011-11-22 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Kinuko Yasuda wrote: > Putting aside the API discussion, actually I like the idea having one > shared > isolated filesystem that contains multiple directories/files being dropped > in, > as in that way both the UA and script can easily distinguish the set of > dr

Re: [whatwg] WHATWG on Google+

2011-11-22 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:40:10 +0100, Ian Hickson wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > Another option is for someone (possibly me) to create a system whereby > people can subscribe to specific portions of the specification, and > for a tool to detect when a diff affects that port

Re: [whatwg] Using requestFileSystem to setup mounts

2011-11-22 Thread Kinuko Yasuda
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote: >> >> Multiple directories still have a shared file system root. Their relative >> paths are exposed in webkitdirectory files already. >> The benefit is neutered .files object while m