* Jesús Ruiz García wrote:
>My proposal is to give more support to this type of works. We could create
>a new tag called "tour" or something similar. If video and audio have own
>tag, also a tour could be differentiated from the other elements of the
>website.
http://www.w3.org/community/declarati
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:30:06 +0100, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > I moved document.URL to DOM Core, made document.documentURI
> > > readonly, and have them both return the same URL concept, which
> > > defaults to "about:blank".
> >
> > They now always
Am 26.06.2012 um 15:52 schrieb Boris Zbarsky:
> On 6/26/12 4:41 AM, Oscar Otero wrote:
>> I understand the problem. Sending only the window dimmensions, screen
>> resolution and other useful information available in media-queries can be
>> enought. For example:
>>
>> Viewport: width=1024px; height
Le 25 juin 2012 à 13:34, Oscar Otero a écrit :
> For example, for an image 100% width in a div of 400px, the browser would
> send a header indicating it need a 400px width image. This solution is also
> valid for css images (backgrounds, for example) and even for video. The
> values to send cou
On 6/26/12 4:41 AM, Oscar Otero wrote:
I understand the problem. Sending only the window dimmensions, screen
resolution and other useful information available in media-queries can be
enought. For example:
Viewport: width=1024px; height=768px; scale=1;
Or even connection information:
Connection
Thanks for your answer, Boris.
I understand the problem. Sending only the window dimmensions, screen
resolution and other useful information available in media-queries can be
enought. For example:
Viewport: width=1024px; height=768px; scale=1;
Or even connection information:
Connection: type=2G
