On Aug 7, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Michael[tm] Smith m...@w3.org wrote:
Anyway, do you have a concrete suggestion for an alternate name? I'm not
wedded to generator-unable-to-provide-required-alt and I doubt Hixie is
either. It's just a proposal that came up after 15 minutes of brainstorming
on
On 08/07/2012 07:51 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I don't mind supporting *decoding* from basically any encoding that
Anne's spec enumerates. I don't see a downside with that since I
suspect most implementations will just call into a generic decoding
backend anyway, and so supporting the same set of
Hi all,
I just sent this e-mail in response to Michael[tm] Smith's request [1] to
register application/microdata+json to ietf-types but I think this is a
better place to discuss this... so sorry for the cross-post.
I was wondering whether it was considered to use JSON-LD [2] instead of
creating
Am 07.08.2012 21:09 schrieb Ian Hickson:
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Markus Ernst wrote:
Am 18.05.2012 23:19 schrieb Kornel Lesiński:
If you'd like to see picture proposal succeed, then please help
fixing its drawbacks. Make selection and embedding of 2x images
easier. Give UA freedom to use cached
On 08/08/2012 12:27 PM, Markus Ernst wrote:
It is better because art direction and bandwidth use cases can be solved
differently in an appropriate manner:
- For the bandwidth use case, no MQ is needed, but only some information
on the sources available to let the UA decide which source to load.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:48 AM, James Graham jgra...@opera.com wrote:
On 08/07/2012 07:51 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I don't mind supporting *decoding* from basically any encoding that
Anne's spec enumerates. I don't see a downside with that since I
suspect most implementations will just call
Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com, 2012-08-08 01:10 -0700:
Lacking any other proposed alternative? Not only do we have Ted's
original suggestion of relaxed, but also this whole subthread of name
suggestions:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2012Aug/0038.html
Yeah in
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
I was wondering whether it was considered to use JSON-LD [2] instead of
creating application/microdata+json. The resulting output would be more
or less the same.
It wasn't. What would be the purpose of doing so?
The only reason there's a MIME
