On Fri, 03 May 2013 18:20:51 +0200, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi
wrote:
2013-05-03 18:37, Simon Pieters wrote:
The past few days I've been working on updating the HTML differences
from HTML4 document, which is a deliverable of the W3C HTML WG but is
now also available as a version
On Sat, 04 May 2013 00:21:18 +0200, Jens O. Meiert j...@meiert.com wrote:
http://html-differences.whatwg.org/
Thanks Simon!
Unrelated to the rest of the conversation, could we reconsider whether
every version of this document needs to list *all* document-internal
changes, in section 6?
I’d
2013-05-06 15:12, Simon Pieters wrote:
I think you should start from making the title sensible. HTML
differences from HTML4 is too esoteric even in this context.
Do you have a suggestion?
I made some suggestions, which you comment later, but I will make
another one here.
Besides, the
I just joined the mailing list, so I apologize for not continuing the
existing thread started here:
http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2013-April/039422.html
Disclaimer: I submitted the Mozilla Bugzilla ticket for some kind of
capability in this area.
Summarizing previous
Le 06/05/2013 21:35, James Burke a écrit :
In my experience as a JS library provider (first with dojo and more
recently with requirejs), JS scripts heavily favor binding to
DOMContentLoaded over document load to do work. DOMContentLoaded is
also what jQuery's ready() uses, which I expect is what
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
1. That assumes tainted cross-origin as a fetching mode.
Unrelated to the rest of the conversation, could we reconsider whether
every version of this document needs to list *all* document-internal
changes, in section 6?
This document doesn't have versions (anymore). Is the length of that section
a problem?
Yes. It’s probably a lesser important
