On Sat Jan 04 2014 at 1:19:14 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 1/4/14 3:16 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote:
> > Thanks for the review. I'd like to better understand what would be
> required
> > to implement off-the-main-thread MQ evaluation in Blink. Since it's a
> Blink
> > specific discussion, I'll start a B
On 1/4/14 3:16 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote:
Thanks for the review. I'd like to better understand what would be required
to implement off-the-main-thread MQ evaluation in Blink. Since it's a Blink
specific discussion, I'll start a Blink-dev thread on the subject.
Note that Gecko has similar constraints
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> >> Is there an editor's draft or some other relatively self-contained
> >> write-up that I could review?
> >
> > Tab has rewritten the
On 1/4/14 1:17 PM, David Bruant wrote:
I imagine the only thing they need is the engineering time both to
implement it
It's a one-line change in Firefox.
and keep an eye open on their bug tracker to see if a
website breaks because of this change
This is the problem. Just watching for bug r
Le 04/01/2014 16:10, Kornel Lesiński a écrit :
I don't think anybody cares for NodeList.forEach/map/filter/etc to be
"real" Array functions, so I'd love to see even a simplest fix like:
NodeList.prototype.map = function(...whatever) {
return Array.from(this).map(...whatever);
}
NodeList.pr
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Kornel Lesiński wrote:
>
> Everywhere on the web where NodeList.forEach() is mentioned, everybody
> agrees that's something that is expected to work, but doesn't. It's followed
> by a list of excuses why it doesn't work, as if it was a completely
> intractable probl
Everywhere on the web where NodeList.forEach() is mentioned, everybody
agrees that's something that is expected to work, but doesn't. It's
followed by a list of excuses why it doesn't work, as if it was a
completely intractable problem that nobody can ever fix in any way
whatsoever.
Can
