On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Justin Novosad wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> >
> > > >> The second does setTransform(0,0,0,0,0,0), which should reset the
> CTM
> > > >> to a zero matrix (again, not invertible). IE, Opera and FF draw a
> > > >> line to 0,0 and c
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Justin Novosad wrote:
>
> I am looking into correcting Chrome's behavior to make it spec-compliant in
> this case. There is one specific primitive that is proving problematic:
> arcTo
>
> The problem is that the algorithm needs to bring the last point in the
> subpath into the
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> > >> The second does setTransform(0,0,0,0,0,0), which should reset the CTM
> > >> to a zero matrix (again, not invertible). IE, Opera and FF draw a
> > >> line to 0,0 and close the path afterwards (which kind of makes sense,
> > >> since the
This sounds like an interesting idea, but I think it would quite easily get
out of hand if people wanted some options from More Strict but not all of
them, there would probably need to be a finer control of permissions.
~ Shane Hudson
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Chris Coyier wrote:
> Hey f
Hey folks. Long time listener, first time caller.
I'm hoping for more a little bit more control over s. We have
which is pretty fantastic right now. I'd like to see some
possibilities in both directions (more and less strict).
More strict:
- Disallow modal dialogs (e.g. alert, confirm) but othe
On Feb 3, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Ben Vinegar wrote:
> Ultimately, seamless doesn’t affect Disqus, because it only applies to
> iframes that share the same origin as the browsing context. Which is good,
> because we don’t want to use the seamless attribute anyways – it would let
> publishers manipulate
