Re: [whatwg] Move RequestAnimationFrame steps into HTML?

2014-09-17 Thread L2L 2L
Web animation is --to my knowledge-- only for the manipulation of the dom's children element and to some extent the dom itself. What of the canvas? Is there any interest in simplifying or and adding on to the requestAnimationFrame? Like making it a constructor or making Daemon object to better

Re: [whatwg] Move RequestAnimationFrame steps into HTML?

2014-09-17 Thread James Robinson
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, James Robinson wrote: > > I'd be happy to do this. I've filed a bug to track it: > >https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.I can't speak for the editors > of that spec, but I'm pretty sure thcgi?id=26839 >

Re: [whatwg] Move RequestAnimationFrame steps into HTML?

2014-09-17 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, James Robinson wrote: > > Cameron and I are editors of the "Timing control for script-based > animations" spec, more commonly known as the spec for > requestAnimationFrame. This spec has some outstanding feedback from > folks like Anne that needs to be addressed at a basic

[whatwg] Move RequestAnimationFrame steps into HTML?

2014-09-17 Thread James Robinson
Cameron and I are editors of the "Timing control for script-based animations" spec, more commonly known as the spec for requestAnimationFrame. This spec has some outstanding feedback from folks like Anne that needs to be addressed at a basic editorial level that I haven't had bandwidth to address

Re: [whatwg] Preventing wake lock leaks with DOM nodes

2014-09-17 Thread Elliott Sprehn
This is what the attached and detached callbacks are for on custom elements. Someone can build an element that requests the lock when it's attached (added to the viewed document) and releases when it's detached (removed from the viewed document). There's no reason to complicate this API, develope