On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> > Re, re-evaluation previous elements: note that UA *can*, just as it does
> > today (modulo some error conditions), hold painting until it finds all
> the
> > stylesheets, regardless of the position in the document. So,
> > assuming that's t
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Simon Pieters wrote:
> A bare or
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Martin Hoernig wrote:
> Thank you Rob!
>
> I'm not sure what this means:
>>
>> Firefox fires the canplaythrough event after buffering is completed or
>>> halted instead of a bandwidth depending solution
>>>
>>> Do you mean that even when the data is arriving at
On 11/04/2014 11:25 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
From: whatwg [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of David Singer
(I don't have IE to hand at the moment).
I tried to test IE but unfortunately it looks like the "URL components from DOM
properties" part of the demo page does not
From: whatwg [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of David Singer
> (I don't have IE to hand at the moment).
I tried to test IE but unfortunately it looks like the "URL components from DOM
properties" part of the demo page does not work in IE, I think because IE
doesn't support do
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 4:50 PM, David Singer wrote:
> really? Safari, Chrome and Opera all return what to me is eminently sensible
>
> stuff://www.app.com/a/b/banana
It does seem like they allow for some different behavior here, indeed!
We still need to special case schemes as e.g. "x" against
On Nov 4, 2014, at 15:32 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 4:24 PM, David Singer wrote:
>> at the moment I am more interested in understanding what the best behavior
>> might be than majority voting
>
> I don't think there is disagreement about what better behavior might
> b
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 4:24 PM, David Singer wrote:
> at the moment I am more interested in understanding what the best behavior
> might be than majority voting
I don't think there is disagreement about what better behavior might
be in this case, if we skip over the details for the moment. Howev
On Nov 4, 2014, at 15:09 , Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 11/04/2014 09:55 AM, David Singer wrote:
>> I am pretty puzzled why the base URL composed
>> with the URL results not in
>>
>> stuff://www.app.com/a/b/banana
>>
>> but
>>
>> stuff:///banana
>>
>> Is this a bug or feature of the spec., or a b
On 11/04/2014 09:55 AM, David Singer wrote:
I am pretty puzzled why the base URL composed with the URL
results not in
stuff://www.app.com/a/b/banana
but
stuff:///banana
Is this a bug or feature of the spec., or a bug in this implementation?
Please refresh. I've changed the implementatio
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:55 PM, David Singer wrote:
> I am pretty puzzled why the base URL composed with
> the URL results not in
>
> stuff://www.app.com/a/b/banana
>
> but
>
> stuff:///banana
>
> Is this a bug or feature of the spec., or a bug in this implementation?
Either of those results w
I am pretty puzzled why the base URL composed with
the URL results not in
stuff://www.app.com/a/b/banana
but
stuff:///banana
Is this a bug or feature of the spec., or a bug in this implementation?
On Nov 4, 2014, at 14:32 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Sam
On 11/04/2014 09:32 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
To help foster discussion, I've made an alternate version of the live URL
parser page, one that enables setting of the base URL:
http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/liveview2.html#foobar://test
Thank you Rob!
I'm not sure what this means:
Firefox fires the canplaythrough event after buffering is completed
or
halted instead of a bandwidth depending solution
Do you mean that even when the data is arriving at a very high rate,
we
don't fire canplaythrough until all the data is downl
On 04/11/2014 9:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:34 PM, cowwoc wrote:
I'm relatively new to this mailing list. How do proposals make their way to
action items here?
I recommend studying https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ
In this particular case Ian will get back to you.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:34 PM, cowwoc wrote:
> I'm relatively new to this mailing list. How do proposals make their way to
> action items here?
I recommend studying https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ
In this particular case Ian will get back to you.
--
https://annevankesteren.nl/
Hi Michal,
I'm relatively new to this mailing list. How do proposals make their way
to action items here?
Thanks,
Gili
On 02/11/2014 4:53 PM, Michal Zalewski wrote:
It's probably OK to replace the URL of the previous page if it
otherwise doesn't interfere with the ongoing navigation. The old
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> To help foster discussion, I've made an alternate version of the live URL
> parser page, one that enables setting of the base URL:
>
> http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/liveview2.html#foobar://test/x
>
> Of course, if there are any bugs in th
On 11/03/2014 10:32 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:19 PM, David Singer wrote:
The readability is much better (I am not a fan of the current trend of writing
specifications in pseudo-basic, which makes life easier for implementers and
terrible for anyone else, including
Thank you! We are interested in contributing and consider a
integration, but we cannot communicate a timeframe for now (the next
paper has to be published within the coming weeks...).
On 2014-11-03 19:49, Domenic Denicola wrote:
Impressive research, Martin! Would you and your team be willing t
20 matches
Mail list logo
