> On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:06 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
>
> On 3/9/15, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> That's a good question. I suspect that .naturalWidth/Height should
>> return the image's dimensions before applying CSS rotations.
>
> I think that that is not what Seth was asking about. IIUC, he asked
On 3/9/15, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Seth Fowler wrote:
On 3/9/15, Seth Fowler wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I wanted to get the opinion of this list on how image-orientation and the
> element's naturalWidth and naturalHeight properties should interact.
> The css-images
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Seth Fowler wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I wanted to get the opinion of this list on how image-orientation and the
> element’s naturalWidth and naturalHeight properties should interact.
> The css-images level 3 spec says:
>
> "The intrinsic height and width are derived f
Hi all!
I wanted to get the opinion of this list on how image-orientation and the
element’s naturalWidth and naturalHeight properties should interact. The
css-images level 3 spec says:
"The intrinsic height and width are derived from the rotated rather than the
original image dimensions.”
Th
