Re: [whatwg] Behavior when

2011-12-07 Thread Adam van den Hoven
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote: > > > > Yehuda Katz > > (ph) 718.877.1325 > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote: > >> > > >> > Yehuda

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on recent WhatWG blog post

2011-02-07 Thread Adam van den Hoven
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Aryeh Gregor > wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Adam van den Hoven > wrote: > > In reality all these belong to javascript, but modifying JS to include > them > > is not feasible. Also, what if I don't want to do crypto in m

[whatwg] Thoughts on recent WhatWG blog post

2011-02-07 Thread Adam van den Hoven
x to do something else. They would have to compromise the the source code itself which is a significantly more difficult thing to do. That is the extent of my conscious thought on the subject. I'm sure someone has a better idea than I in this regard but I thought I'd throw it out there. Adam van den Hoven