That sort of thing. Some languages, like Python, were designed with usability
testing, and any improvement in HTML should be done with that in mind.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
On Apr 2, 2015, at 12:11 PM, Martin Janecke whatwg@prlbr.com wrote:
On 02.04.15 04:59, Bobby Mozumder wrote:
The best experience should be on by default, and you need a built-in MVC
framework in HTML for that to happen.
That's something you take for granted, but other people don't
never saw any examples how your MVC would look like.
Would you care to show how something like
http://backbonejs.org/docs/todos.html would look if
done your way?
I have examples in the original message, as well as in:
http:///www.github.com/mozumder/HTML6
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor
where this
proposal would be a bad idea. You have any ideas on that? Polyfills aren’t
going to cover all possible scenarios, either, since they’re going to be
limited by test coverage.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum
this proposal has gone viral outside of this list.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com http://www.futureclaw.com/
twitter.com/futureclaw https://www.twitter.com/futureclaw
www.linkedin.com
them. Where is the polyfill for CSS Exclusions, for
example?
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com http://www.futureclaw.com/
twitter.com/futureclaw https://www.twitter.com/futureclaw
On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Joshua Cranmer pidgeo...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/30/2015 10:02 PM, Bobby Mozumder wrote:
One thing I’m interested in is to see more technical discussions around
this idea. Like, very specific issues that show a design or
concept flaw. It’s only been
there, there are numerous more issues.
If you can, list them, preferably in the Github so I can track the issues.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com http://www.futureclaw.com/
twitter.com
to assume that JS is a fundamental part of the web. The web is
optimized for hypertext document processing, and most people use it to read
content online. This proposal fixes a remaining issue with that.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum
. This will save
everyone time.
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com http://www.futureclaw.com/
twitter.com/futureclaw https://www.twitter.com/futureclaw
www.linkedin.com/in/mozumder http
this scenario, at the very least.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com
twitter.com/futureclaw
www.linkedin.com/in/mozumder
syntax to get/set data. As we
build on it, there would be an ORM that we could standardize so that clients
could use this SQL syntax.
This basically somewhat standardizes the syntax for structured remote API data
access.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum
implementation differences between them. Isn’t
that enough to cause HTML to be updated to fit this MVC design pattern? It’s a
basic issue in the design of the web.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
#further-uses
Is that OK? Any other options?
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com http://www.futureclaw.com/
twitter.com/futureclaw https://www.twitter.com/futureclaw
www.linkedin.com
in the HREF property, like always.
This proposal should be backwards compatible on older browsers. If it isn’t,
let me know.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com http
that?
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com
twitter.com/futureclaw
www.linkedin.com/in/mozumder
, when was the last time you actually wrote a static HTML file? Does
anyone do that?
For every web site, people actually write templates, not HTML code.
This proposal standardizes on the idea of using HTML for templates.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum
that they like. Editors might, but
readers have no vested interest in click-bait.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com http://www.futureclaw.com/
twitter.com/futureclaw https
to use them.
And besides, there’s still the problem of having to download huge power
inefficient Javascript libraries.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com http://www.futureclaw.com
accesses.
Anyways thanks for listening. If you vote for this, you can use me as a
reference for 4 years of HTML6 experience.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com http
= document.registerElement(‘x-article', { // now
register the element
prototype: proto,
extends: ‘article'
});
ARTICLE is=“X-ARTICLE” model=“myArticleData // and then use a
different name
(And this is the simplified version...)
-bobby
---
Bobby
components, they are *built into the browser.*
You still have to write JS, and they’re not going to do that all the time. If
they use Web components it will be in libraries.
Web components are only going to be created for extremely complex widgets, not
for H1, ARTICLE, etc..
-bobby
---
Bobby
now, where everybody defines expected
behavior of elements and create a catalog of components that anyone can import.
We call that the web browser and that’s why we’re here. =^D
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
, retweets, upvotes, etc.. it looks like a
lot of people want a solution like this. I don’t know how it happened but I
believe this represents peoples wide dissatisfaction with having to use
Javascript frameworks.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum
?
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com http://www.futureclaw.com/
twitter.com/futureclaw https://www.twitter.com/futureclaw
www.linkedin.com/in/mozumder http://www.linkedin.com/in/mozumder
(convert the Markdown model data into HTML, or load API data at a scroll
point”)
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com http://www.futureclaw.com/
twitter.com/futureclaw https
and the message already went through on
w3.org.
thank you!
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com http://www.futureclaw.com/
twitter.com/futureclaw https://www.twitter.com/futureclaw
with
60fps speeds and should be as responsive as native apps.
-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com http://www.futureclaw.com/
twitter.com/futureclaw https://www.twitter.com/futureclaw
residing in the fixtures that can be dynamically reloaded without Javascript.
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozum...@futureclaw.com mailto:mozum...@futureclaw.com
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com http://www.futureclaw.com/
twitter.com/futureclaw https://www.twitter.com
29 matches
Mail list logo
