style="display:none;">
So we praise the terse syntax of it and then offer a NOSCRIPT for
backwards compatibility? Now that is a real step back in my opinion.
On 16/05/2012 00:23, Kornel Lesiński wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2012 23:17:54 +0100, Chris Heilmann
wrote:
The fetish for brevity is something I never understood. More
understandable code is faster to write than cryptic short code.
There is significant difference in verbosity for a *very common
On 15/05/2012 23:11, Anselm Hannemann Web Development wrote:
Tab, maybe you think this is a good type to write the syntax but the majority
of normal web developers are used to use common HTML syntax. This is why we
proposed the picture element and normal attributes using media queries.
Of cours
On 15/05/2012 22:46, Bruce Lawson wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2012 22:18:51 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr.
wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Andy Davies
wrote:
Looking at the srcset proposal it appears to be recreating aspects of
media-queries in a terse less obvious form...
We've already got med
