On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 16:57 +0900, Dave Singer wrote:
> At 19:28 +0200 27/03/07, Christian F.K. Schaller wrote:
> >
> >That is a matter of perception. Flash player which is the de-facto
> >standard at this point provides support on at least linux, windows and
> >M
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 09:04 -0700, Dave Singer wrote:
> At 13:26 +0200 27/03/07, Maik Merten wrote:
> >It's good to know that Apple considers interoperability as something
> >important.
> >
> >Of course in case of the iPod the highly proprietary DRM scheme is
> >preventing true interoperability if
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 11:31 -0700, Kevin Marks wrote:
>
>
> On 3/23/07, Christian F.K. Schaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 08:12 -0700, Kevin Calhoun wrote:
> > On Mar 23, 2007, at 2:56 AM, Maik Merten wrote:
> >
>
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 08:12 -0700, Kevin Calhoun wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2007, at 2:56 AM, Maik Merten wrote:
>
> > MPEG4 adoption to the web has been poor from my point of view. Today
> > I'd
> > guess the absolute king in marketshare is Flash video, then following
> > Windows Media, then followed
ust prefer to not have
> to feed a lawyer's pockets over this issue.
>
> Gareth
>
> On 23 Mar 2007, at 11:49, Christian F.K. Schaller wrote:
>
> > Hi Gareth,
> > This is a strange way of looking at the issue. Once a patent is
> > granted
> > it is
;
> [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patents#In_Europe
> [2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> Software_patents_under_the_European_Patent_Convention#Inventive_step_tes
> t
>
> On 23 Mar 2007, at 10:02, Christian F.K. Schaller wrote:
>
> > It is an Urban Legend tha
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 11:49 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Christian F.K. Schaller wrote:
> >All w3c standards are royalty free and there is no reason why this
> >proposal should be different in that regard. And as Håkon Wium Lie
> >pointed out in another email, the latest SVG
It is an Urban Legend that there are no software patents in the EU. True
enough there is no 'EU' software patents, but a lot of member states do
have them. I suggest going the MPEG LA's webpage and looking at the
patent lists they have there for MPEG4. You will notice that a lot of
the patents are
Hi Vladimir,
Lets put any idea of using MPEG4 in the standard at rest right away.
Unless someone has a brilliant idea for who the open source and freely
distributable Firefox would avoid becoming non-distributable in large
parts of the world, and still conform to the standard by including MPEG4
su
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> ON RECOMMENDED OR MANDATED CODECS
>
> We think it is a mistake to require Ogg support, even as a SHOULD-
> level requirement, for several reasons.
>
> - As mentioned above, some devices may have a much harder time
> implementing Ogg than other codecs. Although a SHOUL
10 matches
Mail list logo
