quire that
instead and then reply to all the pending feedback on video codecs.
http://www.whatwg.org/issues/#graphics-video-codec
Thanks for letting us know.
This message connects the email discussion to the issue tracker...
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/7
--
Dan Connolly
in the meeting...
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/nov07
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 12:14 -0700, John Foliot wrote:
> Dan Connolly wrote:
> >
> > I sympathize with your frustration, but I ask that you remain patient.
>
> Dan,
>
> Thank you for your prompt response. While patience is indeed a virtue, my
> (our?) patience is
.
That's an essential part of quality design decision-making.
I recommend teleconferences as a good way to get a feel for
group priorities and schedule. For example, we talked
about the timing of this table headers issue last week.
http://www.w3.org/2007/08/16-html-wg-minutes#item05
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
ach WG,
such as the one for WAF that shows what Opera and others have agreed to.
Web Application Formats Working Group Patent Policy Status
http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/38483/status
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
g on HTML with you.
p.s. I am copying [EMAIL PROTECTED]; note that if you reply all, you'll
be greeted
by the W3C archive approval anti-spam robots, unless you have already
been through that ritual.
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/aa/
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/