eo
is a great idea, especially given the fact that web sites today should
be as fluid / liquid as possible since there is a need to cater for a
range of different screen sizes.
So this gets my vote FWIW.
Dean Edridge
te at all, and we might as well just
shove the css into the same html file anyway.
Gareth
On 16 Mar 2007, at 20:27, Benjamin West wrote:
On 3/16/07, Dean Edridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Firstly, the chance of someone not being able to access the CSS for
a web
page is I'm guess
Benjamin West wrote:
On 3/16/07, Dean Edridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Firstly, the chance of someone not being able to access the CSS for
a web
page is I'm guessing, pretty slim.
Why is accessing CSS a
problem?
-Ben West
I never said that accessing the CSS would be a
ght of the screen (FF doesn't do this, but IE and
Opera do), therefore causing more problems than if you had just left all
the styling in the CSS to begin with. So the long and the short of it
IMO is to just use CSS and rely on the user-agent to show the page the
best it can in the absence of CSS.
regards,
-- Dean Edridge
On 12 Mar 2007, at 20:19, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
Case:
xyz
xyz-xyz-xyz
is perfectly valid from some abstract semantic machine
point of view but for human these two cells are not
equal. At least hit area is different. And visual perception too.
All you need to do is add this to your CSS:
td >
