On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
> But I think that once you tab one more time on the last element of a scope
>> thenit should go to the first element in that scope.
>>
>
> Disagree.
Then it shouldn't be called a scope since a scope in OSs and native
applications means pret
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Eric Sh. wrote:
>
>> I don't understand where are you going with this, is it a proposal for a
>> tab index scope?
>>
>
> Yes.
>
Then I think it's a good idea, in mo
I don't understand where are you going with this, is it a proposal for a
tab index scope?
And the bug you linked has already been resolved.
Regards,
Eric
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> There are no such plans. I'm not sure where you heard this, but it's
> definitely incorrect.
>
> ~TJ
>
I didn't say that WHATWG is planning it but that I heard I believe from a
talk on mozilla hacks by Chris Heilmann(but i could be wrong)
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> It is certainly wise to keep as dual (tabular data vs. layout) for
> compatibility, instead of introducing new elements to distinguish them - no
> matter how logical or semantic such an idea might sound.
>
I heard there are plans to creat
> How does this relate to the question of adding element vs. adding
attributes?
I am saying that they also added which is the most famous tag to
date(added in HTML 4), so maybe we should have used and that way all browsers would support it no?
> They could do just the same with .
Don't you th
If the web was only using the first tags such as(I think) then the web
woul not be where it is today.
And if we stop adding new features old browsers do not support or not use
them because very little browsers are not supporting them then it would
completely stop innovation and the evolution of t
icking wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Eric Sh. wrote:
> >> On 23/10/2011 08:35, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>> We added support for this in firefox, so you can get the behavior you
> >>> want there in the meantime (I forget what we called the at
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Mark Callow wrote:
> On 23/10/2011 08:35, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
> We added support for this in firefox, so you can get the behavior you
> want there in the meantime (I forget what we called the attribute
> though).
>
> Is there a way for the user to access the r
I was trying out the HTML5 context menu in firefox and I saw that there is
no way(in the specs) to create an empty menu with only selected context menu
items in it.
So for example if I have an image element and I want to create a context
menu with the items: "Rotate" and "Share" - I have to ask th
10 matches
Mail list logo
